This allows for convenient searching, browsing and linking, because
nabble includes message subject in the link. Even if an archive link
does not work in the future, it should be easy to find the thread
knowing its subject.
I try to upload the posts done before I joined nabble, but my support
request awaits a reply.
Am Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:29:40 +0200
schrieb Jarek Czekalski <[hidden email]>:
> I started the archive of this mailing list at nabble.com:
> http://zbar-for-windows.29999.n6.nabble.com/ >
> This allows for convenient searching, browsing and linking, because
> nabble includes message subject in the link. Even if an archive link
> does not work in the future, it should be easy to find the thread
> knowing its subject.
Yeah, that's great in regard of our almost 90 postings so far...
W dniu 2012-06-11 18:18, klaus triendl pisze:
> Now, which one do you prefer? Both?
I use nabble links from Options / Permalink.
>> BTW, seems like numbering of mercurial commits like r391 is not
>> something we may use for permanent referencing. Hashcodes should
>> accompany them.
> I see. 'Accompanying' means we can use both? I'm orienting myself
> with revisions within the hg workbench.
But when you browse our repository online, there the numbers are
missing. Spadix also told me once not to use these short numbers,
despite they are so handy.
When you want the reference to be permanent use the hashcode. For short
time convenience use r number. Using them both seems to be the best
If we ever join zbar, these r numbers alone would be misleading.